Skip to content

Who uses Kotahi

Rewritten. Rewritten for this site to reflect eLife Pathways stewardship. Replaces earlier text that is no longer accurate. Rewritten from the archived Case Studies page. Commissioned-development detail and named personal testimonials have been withheld pending permission — see the note at the foot of this page.

Kotahi is in production with organisations running quite different publishing models. Two are documented here; more are in progress.

metaror.org — a project of the Research on Research Institute (RoRI), focused on meta-research and research evaluation.

MetaROR runs a Publish-Review-Curate model. eLife Pathways hosts and manages the full technical infrastructure.

Kotahi provides:

  • preprint metadata submission
  • review management
  • curation
  • publication
  • DOI registration

Live instances: submit.metaror.org for submission and review, with published output on the MetaROR site.

ncrc.jhsph.edu — a collaboration of scientists and public health experts at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, evaluating and summarising key COVID-19 research during the pandemic.

The NCRC team had been managing a high volume of pandemic preprints in spreadsheets. They moved to Kotahi for triage and review management.

Kotahi provided:

  • automated import of metadata from bioRxiv and PubMed
  • assisted preprint search
  • a triage workflow
  • review management
  • export to spreadsheets

At the time, NCRC still published to WordPress via those spreadsheets — this predated Kotahi having a CMS. The same group is now using Kotahi with the CMS layer for a further project.

Kotahi is also used by eLife itself, as an extension to its existing platform for Publish-Review-Curate, and by a number of other groups across four service tiers. Individual entitlements vary, so nothing on this page should be read as a description of what any particular customer receives.